Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Versus Sony 16-55mm f/2.8 G: Which Is the

Tamron made waves a few years ago with its 28-75mm f/2.8 lens for Sony full frame cameras. Now there’s an APS-C version and it might make the equivalent Sony lens look massively overpriced. How good is the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony crop-sensor cameras? Tamron announced the its new 17-70mm f/2.8 late last year and those lucky enough to get their hands on it seem to be very impressed. In this detailed video, Arthur R puts it head-to-head with Sony’s own APS-C workhorse, the 16-55mm f/2.8 G. At $1,298, the Sony is dramatically more expensive than the Tamron which costs a mere $799.

Ultimate aps-c setup? : r/SonyAlpha

Best Budget Zoom Lens: Sigma 18-50 vs Sony 16-55 vs Tamron 17-70 Comparison — Eightify

Sigma 18-50 vs Tamron 17-70, Best Budget FX30 Zoom?

Review: Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 for Fujifilm review: Lightweight with superior optics

Tamron 17-70 f/2.8 VC Review: The Perfect Lens? - Light And Matter

Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G Lens Review - Casual Photophile

Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Review

Positioned as the workhorse lens for APS-C, the Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G is a flexible wide-angle to portrait-length zoom featuring a bright constant

Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G Lens

Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Review

Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 for Fujifilm X Announced - Press Release - Fuji Rumors